Is an employee considered disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act of 1995 (DDA) if they are addicted to drugs or alcohol?
The Disability Discrimination Act of 1995 (DDA) was formed to make it unlawful to discriminate against a person with a disability in relation to employment, education, the provision of goods and services, and transport.
The DDA was set up to protect anyone with a disability. A disability can be defined as a "physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day to day activities." Areas of discrimination that the act was created to address include harassment, victimization, discrimination, and failure of an organization to make appropriate adjustments or accommodations regarding access to goods, services and facilities.
A "substantial" effect could refer to a daily task that takes much longer to complete due to a disability (for example, getting dressed). A "long term" adverse effect is generally one that affects a person for 12 months or more.
The Equality Act 2010 replaces the DDA of 1995
The Equality Act 2010 has replaced the DDA of 1995, except in Northern Ireland where it still applies. It was created with the primary purpose of consolidating and updating the prior Acts and regulations that formed the basis of anti-discrimination law in the UK. Along with disability discrimination, the Act covers discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, religion, beliefs and age.
Are drugs or alcohol included under the Equality Act 2010?
There are certain conditions that aren't covered by the disability definition. Generally, an addiction to non-prescription drugs or alcohol is not considered a disability under the Equality Act 2010. This was also the case under the DDA of 1995. Therefore, an employee would not be considered disabled under either the Equality Act 2010 or the DDA of 1995 if they are addicted to drugs or alcohol.
However, an employee many have a disability or condition that has resulted from a drug or alcohol addiction. In this case the resulting condition may mean that they are considered disabled.
For example, liver disease that has resulted from alcohol abuse can be considered a disability. The cause of the liver disease, or the contributing factors are not considered relevant. Similarly, a mental illness that may have partially or fully arisen from drug or alcohol abuse would be considered a disability.
Drug or alcohol addiction alone is not considered a disability. Any disease or condition that could be connected to the addiction is treated as separate, and therefore may be considered a disability.
Written by Work Place
More Q&As from our experts
- What is an ergonomic assessment?
- What are some of the key things employers need to consider about ergonomics in the workplace?
- How is sleep apnea diagnosed?
- Leadership Assessment
- Adverse Action Letter
- Antitrust Acts or Laws
- Background Check
- Background Investigation
- Cause of Action
- Conditional Job Offer
- Consumer Report
7 Tricks to Limit Risk in Safety-Sensitive Workplace Positions
Fitness-to-Work & The Future of Drug Testing
Subscribe to the Workplace Testing Newsletter
Join thousands of employment testing and employee wellness professionals.
- Sleep Apnea in the Workplace: Your Comprehensive Guide to Proper Diagnosis
- DOT Drug & Alcohol Testing: Your Comprehensive Guide to Getting It Right the First Time
- An In-Depth Look at Drug Hair Testing
- 5 Ergonomics Concepts All Employers Should Know and Understand
- What Your Company's Drug and Alcohol Policy May Be Missing (and How to Get It Right)